916 replies to this topic

[bayne420]

until get a full survey on the revised NOS effect, it might still be better then the rest

[camocanine]

bayne420, on 04 June 2012 - 05:45 PM, said:

until get a full survey on the revised NOS effect, it might still be better then the rest

Agreed. With some cars apparently scoring +1 for NOS, yes +25 is pretty impressive!!

[camocanine]

After playing around with the 2010 Porsche Boxster Spyder a little more and taking some advice from ABDmaster about Handling tests, I found that my previous test video for this car desperately needed a Handling update. This car should clear 205 KM/H, if you can get enough speed built up since it seems to handle better the faster it goes. It's odd...
Anyway, if you haven't tried it, this car is an AWESOME T2!!

[trickeh]

Very intresting idea about that weight thing. Never really thought about that. I belive there is a better place (perhaps) for testing that, the iron sign thinge located at the start of paradise hotel. I didnt know the boxter was such a competetive car!

[Gigaxero]

hey I'm back after short break and of course with some test results. So we are testing NOS again without skill mods?? Here's sommething to start with
Escort +4
Chevelle +20
Murcielago +34
MX-5 I managed to get it to +3
El Camino +22
Scio tC +3
RX-7 +3
Scirocco +3
Skyline R32 +5

and few weight test results

R8 4.2 38
RX-7 47
M1 Procar 47

Edited by Gigaxero, 07 June 2012 - 10:52 AM.

[ExPro]

Gigaxero, on 07 June 2012 - 10:37 AM, said:

R8 4.2 38
RX-7 47
M1 Procar 47

So, the higher the weight test result, the better the car handles?

[Gigaxero]

ExPro, on 07 June 2012 - 12:01 PM, said:

So, the higher the weight test result, the better the car handles?

Gigaxero, on 30 May 2012 - 04:18 PM, said:

btw like I noticed before this is based on handling compared to weight. Bad handling= heavy Good handling: light. This must be only logic thing in World so far

Well that what it seems like, but of course there might be some variation. Best example is Super bee: It has the lowest result in weight test so its a heavy car and we all know how it handles

Edited by Gigaxero, 07 June 2012 - 02:23 PM.

[ALO23NSO]

When will be an update?

[ABDmaster]

ALO23NSO, on 09 June 2012 - 03:06 PM, said:

When will be an update?

Game update or this guide topic?? I have updated this topic yesterday.

[Goettens]

Mercedes SLR McLaren

Nos: +6
Handling: 190 O.O in my best try, its possible to reach 192 or even more
Weight: 40

Edit:

Nissan GT-R R35
Weight: 37

Evolution X
Nos: 4
Weight: 41

Edited by Goettens, 10 June 2012 - 12:37 AM.

[ALO23NSO]

ABDmaster, on 09 June 2012 - 03:24 PM, said:

Game update or this guide topic?? I have updated this topic yesterday.

So why Goettens have new date?

Goettens, on 09 June 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

Mercedes SLR McLaren

Nos: +6
Handling: 190 O.O in my best try, its possible to reach 192 or even more
Weight: 40

Edit:

Nissan GT-R R35
Weight: 37

Evolution X
Nos: 4
Weight: 41

And what is lexus is 350 nos accel? Is chevelle really so powerful that it can be even the best IGC T1 car?

[Gigaxero]

ALO23NSO, on 10 June 2012 - 01:15 PM, said:

And what is lexus is 350 nos accel? Is chevelle really so powerful that it can be even the best IGC T1 car?

I bet is350 will be around MX-5 and other T1 cars, something like +3. IMO Chevelle has always been best IGC car in T1, I've never been able to run same times with my MX-5 as my Chevelle (Both ones tuned with pro parts)

[ALO23NSO]

And i ve got 1 more question why my silvia with 40% tuned on acc, has 206/7 km/h on "testing way" while my mx5 with 42% on acc has 206 km/h on that way. Stock mx5 is 4 km/h faster than silvia. So what is going on??!

[Gigaxero]

ALO23NSO, on 10 June 2012 - 01:58 PM, said:

And i ve got 1 more question why my silvia with 40% tuned on acc, has 206/7 km/h on "testing way" while my mx5 with 42% on acc has 206 km/h on that way. Stock mx5 is 4 km/h faster than silvia. So what is going on??!

Stock results wont tell a thing how car performs when tuned. Silvia with only 160 stock acceleration, can match Chevelle with 175, when both are pro tuned. Watch ABDmaster's other topic about test results with parts equipped, I think its even more usefull than this with stock results.

Just example: Stock Silvia 160, pro tuned 205
Stock Chevelle 175, pro tuned 205
Stock MR2 175, pro tuned 215!!

Edited by Gigaxero, 10 June 2012 - 02:08 PM.

[Goettens]

ALO23NSO, on 10 June 2012 - 01:15 PM, said:

And what is lexus is 350 nos accel?

The IS350 nos acceleration is +2 or +3, I forgot to test it when it was still stock, and reducing it's durability to zero would take too much time, so I tested it with some parts installed. And maybe the Chevelle isn't the best T1 IGC car when fully tuned, I think that the IS350 and the MX5 can be better because of their good handling, but Chevelle still wins in high speed tracks.

[bayne420]

right...6k Sb for a tier 2 first addition of a SUV, any takers xD besides the El camino, no other demand for a heavy-weight car. Also the visual effects does not seem very impressive, no Riot siren/frame body lights

[camocanine]

bayne420, on 13 June 2012 - 04:30 AM, said:

right...6k Sb for a tier 2 first addition of a SUV, any takers xD besides the El camino, no other demand for a heavy-weight car. Also the visual effects does not seem very impressive, no Riot siren/frame body lights

Oh yeah! I'll be taking one by the end of the week! (must...make...Jurassic Park theme SUV...)

[bayne420]

camocanine, on 13 June 2012 - 04:58 AM, said:

Oh yeah! I'll be taking one by the end of the week! (must...make...Jurassic Park theme SUV...)

better yet... http://world.needfor...s/article/43581

[camocanine]

camocanine, on 13 June 2012 - 04:58 AM, said:

Oh yeah! I'll be taking one by the end of the week! (must...make...Jurassic Park theme SUV...)

Never mind. If I win one, awesome, but other wise the SUVs seem to be incredibly weak right now... Or as I said elsewhere only moments ago " IMHO, the current weight tuning for the big, tough looking SUVs and the firing animation of the Gun and Rocket Launcher (which only flash and make smoke) when you hit NOS are the epitome of impotent rage"...

If anyone has already bought one, please post a weight test. I'm really hoping that the SUV's weight is better than the impressions I've gotten from review and demo videos, since I was very excited about SUVs and hope that I will be proven wrong about this...

Edited by camocanine, 14 June 2012 - 11:54 PM.

[Bambie]

Suv fastest T2 in stock ))

BFH SUV

ACC 194
SPD 255
HND 200